Alexander Loveyko | ChaseLawyers

Alexander Loveyko, Esq., a New York-licensed attorney based in Miami, specializes in intellectual property and entertainment law at ChaseLawyers®. He has a proven track record of assisting brands and influencers with their unique legal needs in the rapidly evolving digital landscape. Mr. Loveyko expertly navigates the complexities of social media technology projects, offering comprehensive legal support for advertising and transactional agreements, deals between brands and influencers, as well as new social media projects that similarly need to be guided when it comes to staying within the boundaries of social media, advertising, privacy and copyright laws.

Additionally, he has experience in organizing and managing online sweepstakes and contests, involving brands, third-party sponsors, organizers of sweepstakes, and influencers tasked with promoting a specific contest, providing end-to-end legal oversight to safeguard both the brands and their participating audiences. With a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by the internet and social media, Mr. Loveyko is a trusted advisor to clients looking to maximize their online presence while minimizing legal risks.

Session I – Smart Contracts and Legal Enforceability | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

• Smart contracts
  • Definition and basic concepts of smart contracts in blockchain technology
  • How smart contracts function: Self-executing agreements based on code
  • Use cases of smart contracts in decentralized platforms, DeFi, NFTs, and DAOs
• Legal issues in smart contract execution
  • Legal status of smart contracts: Are they recognized as legally binding agreements?
  • Potential issues arising from the automatic nature of execution
  • Ensuring intent and consent in code-based agreements: Aligning legal standards with technical automation
• Enforceability of code-based contracts
  • Key factors determining enforceability of smart contracts in different jurisdictions
  • Challenges in reconciling code with legal language and contract terms
  • Notable case law and regulatory guidelines on smart contracts enforceability
• Dispute resolution in smart contract disputes
  • Methods of resolving disputes arising from smart contracts
  • The role of arbitration, mediation, and on-chain dispute resolution mechanisms
  • Exploring the concept of “code is law” vs. traditional legal frameworks
• Addressing security vulnerabilities
  • Common security issues in smart contracts: Bugs, hacks, and flaws
  • Legal implications of vulnerabilities: Liability for damages caused by flawed code
  • Best practices for auditing and securing smart contracts before deployment
• Integrating traditional legal principles with smart contracts
  • Bridging the gap between traditional legal concepts (e.g., contract law, tort law) and smart contract functionality
  • How to incorporate traditional legal safeguards (force majeure, breach remedies) into smart contracts
  • Future developments in legal standards for smart contracts and hybrid contracts (partcode, part-legal text)

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Jurisdictional Selection in Web3 Projects | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

• Understanding legal jurisdictions for decentralized projects
  • Jurisdictional options for Web3 projects
  • How jurisdiction impacts regulatory compliance in decentralized environments
  • Considerations for establishing legal presence in various regions
• Comparing offshore vs. onshore jurisdictions.
  • Key differences between offshore and onshore jurisdictions for Web3 companies
  • Benefits of offshore jurisdictions: Tax efficiencies, legal flexibility
  • Onshore jurisdictions and stricter compliance: When to consider
• Key considerations in choosing a jurisdiction
  • Regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and decentralized platforms
  • Privacy laws, data protection regulations, and IP laws
  • Taxation implications for digital assets and cross-border transactions
• Jurisdictions favorable to web3 projects
  • Popular jurisdictions: Malta, Singapore, Switzerland, Cayman Islands, Estonia
  • Benefits of regulatory clarity and favorable tax policies
  • Case studies of successful Web3 projects in these jurisdictions
• Navigating compliance with global regulatory bodies
  • Understanding multi-jurisdictional challenges in decentralized projects
  • How to ensure compliance with global regulations such as GDPR, FATF, and AML/KYC
  • Strategies for mitigating legal risks in different jurisdictions
• Future of jurisdictional selection in a decentralized world
  • How evolving global regulations may impact jurisdictional choices
  • Predictions for emerging jurisdictions and their relevance to Web3
  • Potential for supranational frameworks governing decentralized projects