Legal Strategies for Representing Today’s College Athletes: Drafting NIL Agreements, Navigating Revenue Sharing, and NCAA Reforms

Jason Belzer
Joshua M. Frieser
Christopher M. Brolley
Michael S. Lowe
Stephen E. Vanyo
Jason Belzer | Student Athlete NIL (SANIL)
Joshua M. Frieser | Frieser Legal
Christopher M. Brolley | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Michael S. Lowe | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Stephen E. Vanyo | Law Office of Lloyd Z. Remick
Re-Broadcast: August 8, 2025

3 hour CLE

Tuition: $245.00
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Acces Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – How NIL and the Courts are Transforming the NCAA – Christopher M. Brolley and Michael S. Lowe

On June 6, 2025, Judge Claudia Wilken of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California approved the $2.5 billion class action settlement in House v. NCAA. This pivotal decision marks a significant transformation in college sports, altering the landscape of compensation for name, image, and likeness (NIL). Join Troutman Pepper Locke litigators Michael Lowe and Christopher Brolley as they discuss how the approved settlement will impact the future of college athletics and student athlete’s rights. Callan G. Stein contributed significantly to shaping the content, insights, and materials that will be shared during this session.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Background and history of NIL
  • Settlement terms
  • The court’s findings and legal reasoning on roster limits, collective bargaining/athlete employment status, antitrust law compliance, and Title IX
  • Enforcement and the role of the college sports commission
  • The June 13, 2025 Question and Answer Guidance document
  • Implications for NIL and the future of the NCAA

Session II – Negotiating and Drafting NIL Agreements: Protecting IP, Preserving Value, and Navigating Legal Risk – Joshua Frieser

The emergence of NIL rights in collegiate athletics has created a fast-evolving legal arena blending IP, contracts, and branding. Attorneys advising student-athletes, influencers, and emerging public figures must navigate complex NIL agreements that often include clauses impacting IP ownership, revenue-sharing, and dispute resolution. We’ll focus on the considerations for drafting NIL agreements that comply with current laws and protect the long-term value of one’s personal brand. We’ll understand the best practices for identifying red-flag clauses, structuring enforceable terms, and advising clients on valuation and compliance. Drawing from practical case examples and current litigation trends, the program will also examine the increasing sophistication of NIL deal structures, and the legal pitfalls attorneys must avoid.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Drafting NIL agreements that protect long-term brand and IP value
  • When NIL agreements require legal representation
  • Valuation challenges and compensation structures in NIL deals
  • Intellectual property ownership and licensing in NIL agreements
  • Enforcing and defending NIL contractual claims
  • NIL risk assessment and red flag clauses in third-party agreements

Session III – Compensating College Athletes: NIL, Revenue Sharing, and the Legal Landscape Ahead – Jason Belzer

This session will provide a fast-paced, forward-looking guide of how recent legal developments and the evolving NIL landscape are reshaping the economic model of college athletics. We’ll examine the implications of the House v. NCAA settlement, the emerging framework for direct athlete revenue sharing, and the complex legal and compliance challenges facing institutions, collectives, and third-party platforms. Attendees will gain insight into the legal reengineering required to operate in a system where student-athletes are compensated more like employees, and what lawyers need to know to advise clients in this rapidly changing environment.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Legal fallout from House v. NCAA: What the settlement really means for schools, conferences, and athletes, and how it sets the stage for future antitrust and employment litigation
  • Structuring athlete revenue share agreements: Legal considerations around employment status, Title IX compliance, tax implications, and collective bargaining rights
  • The NIL infrastructure shift: How collectives, marketplaces, and athlete platforms are evolving into full-fledged business units within college sports
  • Ethics and conflicts of interest: Key issues for attorneys navigating dual representation, institutional interests, and athlete advocacy

Session IV – Representing the Modern-Day Athlete: NIL's Impact on the Legal Industry – Stephen Vanyo

Name, image, and likeness (NIL) has shaken up the game, not just in college sports, but at the high school level too. This session dives into what it takes to represent athletes in this fast-moving NIL era. We’ll talk real-world negotiation tactics, how to build smart deals, and how to navigate the rules coming from the NCAA, state laws, school policies, and intellectual property rights as an attorney and best negotiation tactics and strategy when representing athletes in NIL agreements. We’ll also break down what the House v. NCAA settlement means for deal structures going forward, and what it takes to properly represent today’s athlete on and off the field.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What is "Real" NIL vs. what is Fake NIL, and how to tell the difference, restrictions on NIL in place for HS athletes.
  • Issues of representation, fee structure, risks with Uniform Athlete Agency Act
  • House Settlement and impact
  • Future of NIL for HS and NCAA athletes, legal issues presented

Date / Time: August 8, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 4:20 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 3:20 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 2:20 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 1:20 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Jason Belzer | Student Athlete NIL (SANIL)

Jason Belzer is Founder of Student Athlete NIL (SANIL), an agency of record that specializes in assisting brands, universities and student-athletes navigate the new era of name, image and likeness. SANIL manages more than 50 NIL collectives at universities across the country and has negotiated over $75 million in NIL deals. The agency also hosts the annual NIL Summit at the College Football Hall of Fame in Atlanta.

Jason is also founder and President of GAME, Inc., an agency that specializes in the career management and marketing of coaches and the creation of collegiate sporting events. The firm has negotiated more than $100 million in contracts to date. He is also co-founder of AthleticDirectorU, a transformative digital media and professional development platform for college athletic administrators and coaches. ADU is the No. 1 consumed original content publication in the college sports industry.

Belzer graduated from Rutgers University, earning degrees in Sport Management and Political Science. He went on to receive his MBA from the University of Illinois and a JD from Rutgers University School of Law and is a licensed attorney in New York and New Jersey.

 

Joshua M. Frieser | Frieser Legal

Joshua M. Frieser, Esq. is a sports business lawyer and Principal Attorney at Frieser Legal. His practice is focused on the representation of athletes, agents, sponsors, and sports businesses.

While working to solve the unique legal needs that they have, Josh represents athletes in eligibility and disciplinary proceedings and NIL licensing agreements, as well as in related intellectual property and business planning matters. In addition to serving as counsel to college and professional athletes, Josh represents sports agents and sports industry ventures as outside counsel. Josh also serves as a trusted advisor to sponsors working with athletes and sports properties.

Josh is a member of the State Bar of Wisconsin and an active member of its Sports & Entertainment Law Section. He is also a member of the Sports Lawyers Association. Additionally, Josh serves on the Sports Advisory Committee for the American Arbitration Association.

 

Christopher M. Brolley_FedBarChristopher M. Brolley | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Chris advises higher educational institutions of all sizes, including colleges and universities, on Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compliance issues. He provides comprehensive guidance on permissible and impermissible NIL activities and navigating state NIL laws, NCAA Bylaws, and other NCAA policies. Chris creates and implements tailored strategies for mitigating the potential risk of NCAA and state attorney general enforcement activity. He co-hosts the firm’s “Highway to NIL” podcast and serves as an editor for the NIL Revolution blog. Both platforms explore the dynamic legal landscape and recent developments in NIL law.

In addition to his NIL work, Chris’ diverse practice includes the representation of pharmaceutical, medical device, agricultural, and manufacturing companies involving mass tort, personal injury, and wrongful death claims. With experience in federal and state courts across the U.S. — including Philadelphia County’s Mass Tort Program — Chris is also involved in disputes arising out of breach of contract and corporate governance. Chris maintains an active pro bono practice. He represents veterans seeking benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs in connection with their appeals before The Board of Veterans’ Appeals, working closely with the National Veterans Legal Services Program. Chris also represents clients involved with the Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project (MAIP).

 

Michael S. Lowe_FedBarMichael S. Lowe | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Michael is a leading voice on Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) law. He represents an NCAA Division I athletic conference in the settlement of the House antitrust litigation and advises on NIL issues, compliance, and conference policy. He also counsels a Division I university on NIL matters and conducts investigations into potential violations. Michael regularly writes, speaks, and presents on NIL developments, co-hosts the firm’s Highway to NIL podcast, and serves as editor of the NIL Revolution blog.

In addition to his NIL work, Michael brings nearly 25 years of experience as a federal prosecutor and civil litigator. He has led high-stakes cases involving product liability, securities fraud, class actions, the False Claims Act, and government investigations by the DOJ, SEC, FTC, and state attorneys general. His deep trial experience spans jurisdictions nationwide, particularly in Los Angeles and Philadelphia, and he has conducted numerous sensitive internal investigations across industries including health care, financial services, and crypto.

 

Stephen E. Vanyo | Law Office of Lloyd Z. Remick

Stephen E. Vanyo is a registered Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Agent for NCAA and High School athletes in several states, and a certified NFLPA Contract Advisor and Agent. His legal practice focuses on supporting athletes and talent in sports, social media, and entertainment, with work that includes intellectual property protection and registration, IP licensing, and contract drafting/negotiation.

Stephen has successfully negotiated NIL, media, and branding agreements across major platforms—most recently for the Hulu docuseries GRAILS, Amazon Prime’s Spy High, and Channel 5 UK’s Back from the Dead: Who Kidnapped Me. He’s also represented clients in the acquisition of a UGC game on the Roblox platform, digital distribution with a major record label, and trademarking and branding strategy for professional musicians and sports figures.

Stephen is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and graduated from Temple University Beasley School of Law in Philadelphia. He earned his undergraduate degree Magna Cum Laude from Loyola University Maryland, where he served as Local Music Director for WLOY Loyola Radio. He has been named a Super Lawyers “Rising Star” (2023–2025), an honor reserved for only 2.5% of attorneys following a rigorous peer-reviewed nomination process. Stephen is frequently quoted in the Philadelphia Inquirer and speaks regularly at entertainment and sports industry events.

Agenda

Session I – How NIL and the Courts are Transforming the NCAA | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • Background and history of NIL
  • Settlement terms
  • The court’s findings and legal reasoning on roster limits, collective bargaining/athlete employment status, antitrust law compliance, and Title IX
  • Enforcement and the role of the college sports commission
  • The June 13, 2025 Question and Answer Guidance document
  • Implications for NIL and the future of the NCAA

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Negotiating and Drafting NIL Agreements: Protecting IP, Preserving Value, and Navigating Legal Risk | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Drafting NIL agreements that protect long-term brand and IP value
  • When NIL agreements require legal representation
  • Valuation challenges and compensation structures in NIL deals
  • Intellectual property ownership and licensing in NIL agreements
  • Enforcing and defending NIL contractual claims
  • NIL risk assessment and red flag clauses in third-party agreements

Break | 3:10pm – 3:20pm

Session III – Compensating College Athletes: NIL, Revenue Sharing, and the Legal Landscape Ahead | 3:20pm – 3:50pm

  • Legal fallout from House v. NCAA: What the settlement really means for schools, conferences, and athletes, and how it sets the stage for future antitrust and employment litigation
  • Structuring athlete revenue share agreements: Legal considerations around employment status, Title IX compliance, tax implications, and collective bargaining rights
  • The NIL infrastructure shift: How collectives, marketplaces, and athlete platforms are evolving into full-fledged business units within college sports
  • Ethics and conflicts of interest: Key issues for attorneys navigating dual representation, institutional interests, and athlete advocacy

Session IV – Representing the Modern-Day Athlete: NIL’s Impact on the Legal Industry | 3:50pm – 4:20pm

  • What is “Real” NIL vs. what is Fake NIL, and how to tell the difference, restrictions on NIL in place for HS athletes.
  • Issues of representation, fee structure, risks with Uniform Athlete Agency Act
  • House Settlement and impact
  • Future of NIL for HS and NCAA athletes, legal issues presented

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
3.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
3 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3.6 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
180 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
3.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
3.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
3 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
3 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
3 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
3.6 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
3 General

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Register Now

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Microsoft Copilot AI tool for Lawyers (Part 2)
Microsoft Copilot AI tool for Lawyers (Part 2) Thu, July 31, 2025
Live Webcast
Diagnosing and Proving Traumatic Brain Injuries and PTSD
Diagnosing and Proving Traumatic Brain Injuries and PTSD Thu, August 14, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts
Sketching Legacies: A guide to drafting wills and trusts Fri, August 22, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay