High-Impact Depositions: From Hitchhiking to Hard Admissions—Lock Testimony, Dismantle Methodologies, Expose Flaws, and Leverage Body Language (Includes 1 Hour of Ethics)

Dr. Abbie Maroño
Karen Koehler
Gerald A. Connor
David H. Pikus
Dr. Abbie Maroño | Social-Engineer, LLC
Karen Koehler | Stritmatter Law
Gerald A. Connor | Margolis Edelstein
David H. Pikus | Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C.
Live Video-Broadcast: August 21, 2025

3.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $295.00
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Acces Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – Deposition Dos and Don’ts – David H. Pikus

While depositions can serve a range of strategic goals, they’re often misused or fail to meet their full potential. This session will examine both effective and ineffective deposition practices, highlighting commonly missed opportunities and misdirected tactics that undermine their value.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What the deposition is
    • Securing and locking in a witness’s account
    • Clarifying uncertainties
    • Gaining insight into the opposing party’s case, whether favorable or unfavorable
    • Effectively addressing and incorporating documentary evidence
  • What the deposition is not
    • A trial run or performance
    • A tool for intimidation
    • A showcase for the questioning attorney's argument or case strategy

Session II – Strategic Expert Depositions: Targeting Expert Credentials, Biases, Applied Methodology, and Hitchhiking Opportunities – Karen Koehler

An effective cross-examination begins long before trial, often in the expert’s deposition. This session explores how to take strategic, purpose-driven depositions of expert witnesses that not only uncover critical facts but also shape your roadmap for dismantling their credibility at trial. You'll learn how to zero in on relevant credentials, expose inherent biases, and test the validity of methodologies, all while remaining alert to "hitchhiking" opportunities that can yield powerful admissions or inconsistencies. The focus will be on sharpening your approach to ensure every minute of the deposition serves a tactical purpose.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Extreme efficiency in expert depositions is under rated
  • Match the style of taking the deposition to the specific goals of the case
  • Consider the psychological aspects of how the expert forms to assist with later cross examination
  • When to utilize "hitchhiking"

Session III – The Nonverbal Communication of Appearing Trustworthy – Dr. Abbie Maroño

In this session, you will learn how to create cooperation and trust through your own body language. We will explore the science behind why certain nonverbal behaviors increase perceived trustworthiness and how small shifts in your posture, facial expressions, and tone can significantly change the way others respond to you. You will also learn which behaviors may be undermining your perceived confidence and competence without you realizing it, and how to replace them with signals that convey calm, credibility, and strength.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • How your body communicates trust before you speak
  • The role of posture, gestures, and facial expression in cooperation
  • Why these behaviors work: The science behind trust signals
  • Behaviors that reduce perceived competence and how to shift into confident, trustworthy presence

Session IV – Legal Ethics in Depositions – Gerald A. Connor

The Rules of Professional Conduct of every State govern all our actions as attorneys, including conduct during depositions. In addition to our duties to a client, attorneys also have ethical duties related to witnesses, other parties and counsel, and the process of a deposition overall. Zealous advocacy must be tempered with civility and a knowledge of your ethical obligations. This session will explore key ethical obligations under the ABA Model Rules, including Rules 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.6, 2.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 8.4, highlighting key ethical duties of competence, communication, confidentiality, honesty, and fairness.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Identify the rules of professional conduct as they relate to depositions
  • Highlight the distinction between preparing a witness vs. coaching a witness
  • The critical etiquette tips necessary for a smooth deposition
  • Recent developments with the unique issues that arise in remote depositions

Date / Time: August 21, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 5:00 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 4:00 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 3:00 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 2:00 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Dr. Abbie Maroño | Social-Engineer, LLC

Dr. Abbie Maroño is an internationally recognized behavioral scientist, named a top 1% expert by the U.S. Department of State. She has delivered specialized training to elite agencies including the U.S. Secret Service, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security. Dr. Abbie is the creator of The Upper Hand, a proprietary framework for influence and decision-making. Her expertise was recognized by the U.S. Secret Service, who invited her to teach this framework, and honored her with an award for her outstanding contribution to their forensic services.

Earning her PhD in Psychology, she became a professor at 23 and now serves as Director of Education at Social-Engineer, LLC. She contributes regularly to Forbes and Apple News and has been featured on BBC News, WIRED, and Forbes Breaking News. As a trusted expert witness, she has consulted on high-profile legal cases, including lawsuits involving A-list celebrities.

Dr. Abbie is also a TEDx speaker, bestselling author, coach, and award-winning academic reviewer recognized for her contributions to the global research community.

 

Karen Koehler | Stritmatter Law

Karen (“The Velvet Hammer”TM) Koehler is a managing partner at Stritmatter Law in Seattle, Washington. She represents plaintiffs in wrongful death, personal injury and civil rights cases. None of her verdicts have included punitive damages as Washington is a non-punitive state. Karen achieved a $123M verdict in a Ride the Ducks trial in 2019 and a $44 M verdict in a motorcycle crash case followed by a $3.5M wrongful murder verdict both in 2022.

She’s achieved numerous other verdicts and settlements including a $10M settlement for 50 BLM peaceful protesters against Seattle and a $3.5M settlement against the city for the wrongful death of Charleena Lyles, a victim of police violence whose name was often chanted in those protests. She is currently enjoying litigating against Amazon and its delivery program. Karen is a past trial lawyer of the year and president of the Washington Association for Justice. She is a past recipient of the Melvin Belli Award. Her Velvet Hammer tm podcast is in its 6th year. She has three daughters, three grandchildren and has practiced trial law for 40 years.

 

Gerald-A.-Connor_Margolis-Edelstein_FedBarGerald A. Connor | Margolis Edelstein

Gerald A. Connor is a partner and trial attorney in the Scranton, Pennsylvania, office of Margolis Edelstein, a full-service multi-state litigation provider to the insurance industry, major corporations, and governmental entities. He focuses his practice on casualty litigation, ranging from automobile and general liability claims to products liability, construction litigation, and workers’ compensation claims. Mr. Connor also has extensive experience in commercial litigation, insurance coverage and First Party claims, and employment law. He has handled dozens of trials, administrative hearings, and arbitrations to verdict, and is active at the appellate level in both state and federal court. Mr. Connor is a member of the Lackawanna County and Pennsylvania bar associations. He earned his B.A. degree from the University of Pennsylvania and his J.D. degree from Widener University School of Law and is a frequent lecturer at both the State and National level.

 

David H. Pikus_FedBarDavid H. Pikus | Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C.

David H. Pikus is a principal at Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C., practicing in the firm’s New York City and New Jersey offices. He has been a litigator for over 43 years and conducted depositions spanning the spectrum of civil cases: commercial litigation, family and estate proceedings, bankruptcy examinations, securities, intellectual property, banking, shareholder litigation, administrative law and public utility and energy regulation. He previously co-headed the litigation department at one of New York’s largest law firms. He is a graduate of Princeton University and the University of Virginia School of Law, and a Special Master of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Agenda

Session I – Deposition Dos and Don’ts | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • What the deposition is
    • Securing and locking in a witness’s account
    • Clarifying uncertainties
    • Gaining insight into the opposing party’s case, whether favorable or unfavorable
    • Effectively addressing and incorporating documentary evidence
  • What the deposition is not
    • A trial run or performance
    • A tool for intimidation
    • A showcase for the questioning attorney’s argument or case strategy

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Strategic Expert Depositions: Targeting Expert Credentials, Biases, Applied Methodology, and Hitchhiking Opportunities | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Extreme efficiency in expert depositions is under rated
  • Match the style of taking the deposition to the specific goals of the case
  • Consider the psychological aspects of how the expert forms to assist with later cross examination
  • When to utilize “hitchhiking”

Break | 3:10pm – 3:20pm

Session III – The Nonverbal Communication of Appearing Trustworthy | 3:20pm – 3:50pm

  • How your body communicates trust before you speak
  • The role of posture, gestures, and facial expression in cooperation
  • Why these behaviors work: The science behind trust signals
  • Behaviors that reduce perceived competence and how to shift into confident, trustworthy presence

Session IV – Legal Ethics in Depositions | 3:50pm – 5:00pm

  • Identify the rules of professional conduct as they relate to depositions
  • Highlight the distinction between preparing a witness vs. coaching a witness
  • The critical etiquette tips necessary for a smooth deposition

Break | 4:20pm – 4:30pm

  • Recent developments with the unique issues that arise in remote depositions

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
3.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
3 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1.2 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 Substantive, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
3.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
3.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
3.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
150 General minutes, 60 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
3.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Dual

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Virginia

Not Eligible
2.5 General Hours, 1 Ethics / Professionalism Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 Law & Legal Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Register Now

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Microsoft Copilot AI tool for Lawyers (Part 2)
Microsoft Copilot AI tool for Lawyers (Part 2) Thu, July 31, 2025
Live Webcast