Employee IP Rights and Employer Claims: Strategies for effective IP ownership and assignment

Tina A. Syring
Nick Kuhlmann
Matthew Beyer
Tina A. Syring | Husch Blackwell LLP
Nick Kuhlmann | Husch Blackwell LLP
Matthew Beyer | Husch Blackwell LLP
On-Demand: November 13, 2024

2 hour CLE

This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Access Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ live webinars.
Learn More

Program Summary

In today’s innovation-driven economy, the line between employer and employee ownership of intellectual property (IP) is often blurred. While employers commonly assume ownership of IP created during employment, the legal landscape is more nuanced and fraught with potential pitfalls. This comprehensive webinar will explore the complexities of IP ownership, including the legal frameworks, the importance of clear and enforceable agreements, and the potential challenges that both employers and employees may face.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Foundations of Intellectual Property Ownership
  • Employer Ownership of IP
  • Employee Ownership of IP
  • The Role of State Laws and Regulations
  • Independent Contractors and IP Ownership
  • Drafting and Enforcing IP Agreements
  • Dispute Resolution and Litigation Strategies
  • Practical Tips for Employers and Employees

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Tina A. Syring_myLawCLETina A. Syring | Husch Blackwell LLP

A litigator who prioritizes understanding clients’ business culture, Tina defends clients in labor and employment cases and environmental toxic tort matters.

Tina began her legal career with a labor and employment lawsuit and quickly realized that she loved working in a practice area with such a strong human connection. She values the opportunity to work with companies in preparing best practices to create positive employee relations and, when needed, tackle difficult business decisions with employees in mind. Tina’s employment practice is heavily litigation focused, and she divides her time between emergency, bet-the-company cases and investigations that often involve white collar allegations, as well as employment litigation involving accusations of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment; wage and hour violations; and wrongful terminations. When litigation occurs, Tina also works with clients on implementing strategies to avoid similar situations in the future.

In addition to her labor and employment work, Tina has significant experience in toxic tort litigation involving major environmental exposures. These cases often find her in court. Tina thrives in the chess match and challenge of motion practice and trial, finding it immensely satisfying to make winning arguments in court. Earlier in her career, Tina was seconded as a company’s general counsel and human resources director, an experience that gave her an inside perspective on clients’ everyday world. By having this insight, Tina works with clients in a manner that meets their business culture, demands, and constraints, while also providing customized recommendations that are truly actionable for their companies. It is essential for outside counsel to understand a client’s organization and industry, and Tina heavily prioritizes this in her client relationships.

 

Nick Kuhlmann_myLawCLENick Kuhlmann | Husch Blackwell LLP

Nick combines a technical background with extensive litigation experience to serve as a tenacious advocate in patent and trademark matters.

Nick represents clients of all sizes, from small businesses to multinational corporations, in patent and trademark litigation, anticounterfeiting, and trade secret matters. He has served as trial counsel on multiple cases through verdict or bench trial. While he has handled cases in a variety of industries, he is particularly experienced with clients whose businesses focus on the food and food systems spheres, including indoor farming and sustainable agriculture. In addition to his litigation work, Nick also advises clients on trademark portfolio management, trademark prosecution, and domain name enforcement, overseeing a global trademark portfolio for a Fortune 500 fertilizer company.

After beginning his career as an organic chemist for a multinational corporation, Nick earned his law degree and began practicing in IP law in 2004. His chief focus has always been IP litigation; however, he also has experience with patent prosecution and has drafted and prosecuted utility patents in the chemical, mechanical, and medical device fields. Nick has also represented clients in a variety of complex commercial litigation matters, such as insurance coverage, class action antitrust, and massive multidistrict litigation—experience that helps him spot potential legal problems beyond the IP arena.

Crafting compelling legal strategies from complex facts lies at the heart of Nick’s practice. He enjoys analyzing and building a case, he’s known for a flexibility that makes him an agile litigator, and he’s at his happiest when he’s getting results for clients. His broad background gives him a strong advantage here: Nick’s experience in patent prosecution means that he understands the finer details of patents and their histories, helping him develop pointed, persuasive arguments for a case.

 

Matthew Beyer_myLawCLEMatthew Beyer | Husch Blackwell LLP

Matt resolves disputes and litigation for commercial clients in the cleanest way possible.

With extensive experience as a commercial and employment litigator, Matt thrives on advocating for clients. His practice includes high-stakes contractual and business disputes; defending and prosecuting employment claims for discrimination, wrongful termination, and wage and hour allegations; and litigating insurance coverage disputes and bad-faith claims. Matt works with a variety of clients concentrated in the technology, manufacturing, and transportation industries, including global corporations and Fortune 500 companies. Matt’s diverse practice has also included defending large product liability and toxic tort matters, including the defense of private military housing providers from claims of mold exposure in multidistrict and class action disputes.

Matt has tried cases to verdict, and he has argued and won appeals in both state and federal court. He understands the importance—and the art—of presenting a clear, coherent, fact-driven narrative that juries can readily grasp. However, his goal is always to pursue the outcome that’s best for the client, and often, that isn’t trial. Matt knows that in many disputes, drawn-out litigation isn’t beneficial to either party and can be an expensive distraction from business goals. Instead, he seeks the best, cleanest, least intrusive solution for the client, whether that’s arbitration, mediation, settlement, or, in some cases, a full trial.

Aggressive when necessary and conciliatory when not, Matt cares deeply about the client’s best interests. He’s known for his straightforward counsel, always ensuring that clients are fully informed from the outset on the realities of the litigation process. Clients value his open communication and his honest assessment of the risks and benefits of any strategy.

Agenda

I. Foundations of Intellectual Property Ownership | 2:00pm – 2:15pm

  • Intellectual property types: Patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and trademarks
  • Legal principles governing IP ownership between employers and employees
  • The significance of “work for hire” and “assignment of inventions” agreements

II. Employer Ownership of IP | 2:15pm – 2:30pm

  • Understanding the conditions under which employers own IP created by employees
  • The critical importance of written agreements and the risks of relying on assumptions

III. Employee Ownership of IP | 2:30pm – 2:45pm 

  • Scenarios where employees retain ownership of IP developed during employment
  • Analyzing employment contracts and their role in IP ownership
  • Employee rights to inventions created outside of the employer’s scope or resources

IV. The Role of State Laws and Regulations | 2:45pm – 3:00pm

  • How state laws affect IP ownership agreements and employee rights
  • Key state-specific legal requirements for valid IP ownership agreements
  • Navigating multi-state challenges in IP ownership

Break | 3:00pm – 3:10pm

V. Independent Contractors and IP Ownership | 3:10pm – 3:25pm

  • Differentiating between employees and independent contractors in IP law
  • The impact of contractor status on IP ownership and the importance of clear contracts
  • Work-for-hire doctrine and its application to independent contractors

VI. Drafting and Enforcing IP Agreements | 3:25pm – 3:40pm

  • Best practices for drafting clear and enforceable IP ownership agreements
  • Consideration and timing: Ensuring agreements are legally binding and supported by adequate consideration
  • Legal remedies for misappropriation and infringement of IP by employees or contractors

VII. Dispute Resolution and Litigation Strategies | 3:40pm – 3:55pm

  • Common disputes over IP ownership and how to prevent them
  • Strategies for resolving IP ownership disputes without litigation
  • Key litigation considerations and case law updates

VIII. Practical Tips for Employers and Employees | 3:55pm – 4:10pm

  • For employers: Steps to protect your company’s IP from the start of the employment relationship
  • For employees: How to ensure your rights to inventions and ideas are protected
  • Conducting effective IP audits and exit interviews to safeguard intellectual assets

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Mississippi

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Register Now

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Deposing the Financial Expert (2025 Edition)
Deposing the Financial Expert (2025 Edition) Fri, March 14, 2025
Live Webcast
Microsoft Copilot 365 AI tool for Lawyers (Part 1)
Microsoft Copilot 365 AI tool for Lawyers (Part 1) Fri, March 14, 2025
Live Webcast
Dispositive Motions in Federal Court and Florida State Court
Dispositive Motions in Federal Court and Florida State Court Wed, March 19, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases Thu, March 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition)
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
Live Webcast
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition)
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts Mon, March 24, 2025
Live Webcast
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation Wed, March 26, 2025
Live Webcast