Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Using AI to Analyze and Respond to an Opposing Argument

Learn how AI tools can strengthen opposition briefs while maintaining essential human judgment in legal drafting workflows.

2025-03-24 13:00:00

1.5 hours

Program Details

2025-03-24 13:00:00

2025-03-24 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2025-03-24 13:00:00

1.5 hours

Program Details

2025-03-24 13:00:00

Program Details

2025-03-24 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2025-03-24 13:00:00

1.5 hours

Course Overview

AI-Powered Opposition Brief Strategies

2025-03-24 13:00:00

Participants will learn to integrate artificial intelligence tools into opposition brief workflows while maintaining essential human judgment. Practical techniques cover citation verification, evidence management, and ethical compliance.

Format

CLE Credit

1.5h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1.5

Key topics that will be covered

01
Opposition Goals
Winning requires addressing both the judge’s mind and gut with compelling arguments.
02
Traditional Workflow
Follow eight steps: context, objective, outline, annotate, populate, draft, edit, polish.
03
Citation Verification
Use WestCheck or ClearBrief to confirm citations are real and currently good authority.
04
AI Limitations
AI cannot draft persuasive arguments; treat output like work from untrusted associates.
05
Ethical Obligations
Disclose AI use per court rules and protect client confidences in AI interactions.
06
Evidence Management
ClearBrief manages electronic evidence databases and creates hyperlinks to cited evidence.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm EST

Understanding the Core Goal of Opposition Briefs

This session establishes the fundamental objective of opposition drafting: winning the case by addressing both the judge’s logical mind and sense of justice. Attorneys will learn the traditional eight-step opposition workflow and strategies for establishing context, maintaining law and fact buckets, and outlining their narrative before engaging with opposing briefs.

Michael ColantuonoMichael Colantuono
clock 1:30 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Leveraging AI Tools to Achieve Opposition Goals

Explore how artificial intelligence can augment traditional legal work in opposition drafting, from summarizing documents to identifying themes and producing chronologies. This session covers AI capabilities for different brief types, best practices for tables of contents as executive summaries, and appropriate caution when using AI tools for outlining.

Michael ColantuonoMichael Colantuono
clock 2:00 pm - 2:10 pm EST

Scheduled Break for Session Participants

A brief intermission allowing attendees to refresh before continuing with the remaining technical sessions. Use this time to reflect on concepts covered and prepare questions for upcoming material.

Michael ColantuonoMichael Colantuono
clock 2:10 pm - 2:25 pm EST

AI-Powered Analysis of Opposing Counsel Materials

Learn techniques for close reading and annotation of opposing briefs, with emphasis on citation verification using tools like WestCheck and ClearBrief. This session addresses the critical need to verify that opposing counsel’s citations are real, currently valid, and properly characterized before crafting your response.

Michael ColantuonoMichael Colantuono
clock 2:25 pm - 2:40 pm EST

Strengthening Oppositions with AI Drafting and Editing

Discover how to populate outlines effectively, use AI for research support while maintaining human judgment in persuasive drafting, and leverage editing tools like WordRake for polished final products. The session concludes with ethical obligations around AI disclosure, client confidentiality, and the irreplaceable value of human creativity in legal advocacy.

Michael ColantuonoMichael Colantuono
Michael Colantuono

Michael Colantuono

Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, P.C.

Michael Colantuono

Michael Colantuono

Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, P.C.

Michael Colantuono has specialized in municipal law since 1989 and is certified by the California State Bar as a Specialist in Appellate Law. He is perhaps California’s leading expert on the law of local government revenues, with expertise in constitutional law, land use regulation, open meetings, elections, municipal litigation, conflicts of interest, public utilities, LAFCO issues, inverse condemnation, cannabis regulation, and public finance issues.

Education & Credentials

Graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University (BA 1983); University of California, Berkeley School of Law (JD 1988), graduating first in his class; Articles Editor of the California Law Review; Member of the Order of the Coif; Certified by the California State Bar as a Specialist in Appellate Law.

Recognition & Leadership

President of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers; Elected Member of the American Law Institute; Named California Lawyer of the Year in inverse condemnation law by the Daily Journal for his win in City of Oroville v. Superior Court (2019); Received the 2010 Public Lawyer of the Year Award from the California State Bar presented by California Chief Justice Ronald M. George; Elected Treasurer and President of the California Bar; Appointed Chair of the California Supreme Court's Board of Trustees.

Professional Involvement

Serves on the California Judicial Council's Appellate Advisory Committee and its Appellate Caseflow Working Group; President of the City Attorneys' Department of the League of California Cities (2003-2004); Represents the Department on Cal Cities' Board of Directors; Appointed by the California State Assembly Rules Committee to the Commission on Local Governance in the 21st Century; Appointed to the Board of Trustees of the California Bar by two successive Speakers of the California Assembly; Co-chaired the committee which drafted the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act of 1997; Chaired committees which drafted the League of California Cities' Prop. 26 and 218 Implementation Guide; Assisted the Legislative Analyst's Office in the impartial analysis of Proposition 218.

Experience

Argued 14 cases in the California Supreme Court; Briefed 18 cases on local government revenues in the California Supreme Court since 2004; Appeared in all six California District Courts of Appeal; Law clerk to the Honorable James R. Browning, Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1988-1989); Currently serves as City Attorney for the City of Grass Valley and General Counsel for multiple agencies and districts; Previously served as City Attorney for Auburn, Barstow, Calabasas, Cudahy, La Habra Heights, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre; Taught Administrative Law as adjunct Professor at UC Berkeley School of Law in 1995.
Michael Colantuono

Michael Colantuono

Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, P.C.

Michael Colantuono has specialized in municipal law since 1989 and is certified by the California State Bar as a Specialist in Appellate Law. He is perhaps California’s leading expert on the law of local government revenues, with expertise in constitutional law, land use regulation, open meetings, elections, municipal litigation, conflicts of interest, public utilities, LAFCO issues, inverse condemnation, cannabis regulation, and public finance issues.

Education & Credentials

Graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University (BA 1983); University of California, Berkeley School of Law (JD 1988), graduating first in his class; Articles Editor of the California Law Review; Member of the Order of the Coif; Certified by the California State Bar as a Specialist in Appellate Law.

Recognition & Leadership

President of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers; Elected Member of the American Law Institute; Named California Lawyer of the Year in inverse condemnation law by the Daily Journal for his win in City of Oroville v. Superior Court (2019); Received the 2010 Public Lawyer of the Year Award from the California State Bar presented by California Chief Justice Ronald M. George; Elected Treasurer and President of the California Bar; Appointed Chair of the California Supreme Court's Board of Trustees.

Professional Involvement

Serves on the California Judicial Council's Appellate Advisory Committee and its Appellate Caseflow Working Group; President of the City Attorneys' Department of the League of California Cities (2003-2004); Represents the Department on Cal Cities' Board of Directors; Appointed by the California State Assembly Rules Committee to the Commission on Local Governance in the 21st Century; Appointed to the Board of Trustees of the California Bar by two successive Speakers of the California Assembly; Co-chaired the committee which drafted the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act of 1997; Chaired committees which drafted the League of California Cities' Prop. 26 and 218 Implementation Guide; Assisted the Legislative Analyst's Office in the impartial analysis of Proposition 218.

Experience

Argued 14 cases in the California Supreme Court; Briefed 18 cases on local government revenues in the California Supreme Court since 2004; Appeared in all six California District Courts of Appeal; Law clerk to the Honorable James R. Browning, Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1988-1989); Currently serves as City Attorney for the City of Grass Valley and General Counsel for multiple agencies and districts; Previously served as City Attorney for Auburn, Barstow, Calabasas, Cudahy, La Habra Heights, Monrovia, and Sierra Madre; Taught Administrative Law as adjunct Professor at UC Berkeley School of Law in 1995.

Credits by state

AK1.5
AL1.5
AR1.5
AZ1.5
CA1.5
CO2.0
CT1.5
DC1.5
DE1.5
FL1.5
GA1.5
HI1.5
IA1.5
ID1.5
IL1.5
IN1.5
KS1.5
KY1.5
LA1.5
MA1.5
MD1.5
ME1.5
MI1.5
MN1.5
MO1.8
MS1.5
MT1.5
NC1.5
ND1.5
NE1.5
NH90.0
NJ1.8
NM1.5
NV1.5
NY1.5
OH1.5
OK2.0
OR1.5
PA1.5
RI2.0
SC1.5
SD1.5
TN1.5
TX1.5
UT1.5
VA1.5
VT1.5
WA1.5
WI1.5
WV1.8
WY1.5

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Approved
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Approved
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Approved
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Approved
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Pending
Utah
Approved
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Approved
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs