Hot Topics in AI Lawyers Should Know: AI and copyright changes, the AI policy act, and rules of professional conduct in use of AI

Courtney Sarnow
Dhara Shah
Cari L. Sheehan, JD
Courtney Sarnow | Culhane Meadows
Dhara Shah | InfoLawGroup LLP
Cari L. Sheehan, JD | Indiana University Kelley School of Business
On-Demand: May 9, 2024

4 hour CLE

Tuition: $295.00
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Acces Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I - AI and Copyright – Analyzing The Legal Impact of Generative AI Under the Copyright Act - Courtney Sarnow

Generative AI is not only monopolizing the news, but it is legitimately changing how people live and work. With respect to human creativity as expressed in writing, art, music, etc., Generative AI is reshaping not only how we create, but how the law will address this new kind of creativity. Copyright law, which has regulated the protection of creative expression since the founding of the nation, is particularly impacted by these changes. This seminar will address what the current law is with respect to Copyright and AI, what new gaps have developed in Copyright law as a result of the advent of Generative AI, and where the trends are likely to lead us.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Copyright
  • Generative AI
  • The intersection of Copyright and Generative AI
  • Gaps in the Current Law
  • Best Practices

Session II - The AI Policy Act – What This Means for Businesses and the Future of AI Regulation in the US – Dhara Shah

Utah was the first to cross the finish line this year in regulating the ever-increasing use of generative AI tools. This discussion will dive into key requirements the Utah AI Policy Act places on businesses, discuss key considerations for businesses integrating the use of AI – whether through internally developed tools or through engagement of AI vendors – and look forward to what is on the horizon for AI regulation in the US.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Generative AI
  • Breakdown of Utah’s AI Policy Act
  • Key Considerations for Businesses Using AI
  • Future of AI Legislation in the US

Session III - Ethical AI in Law: Navigating the Rules of Professional Conduct - Cari L. Sheehan

This seminar aims to prepare legal and business professionals for the intricate ethical terrain that comes with incorporating artificial intelligence into the legal and business sectors. With the rise of AI technologies, attorneys encounter distinct ethical challenges and prospects in maintaining ethical integrity pursuant to Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly the following: (1) Rule 1.1 (Competence), ensuring they possess the necessary skills and knowledge to navigate AI's impact; (2) Rule 1.4 (Communication), guaranteeing clear and thorough communication with clients regarding the implications of AI technologies on their cases or business operations; (3) Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information) is paramount, especially as AI tools might access or process sensitive information; (4) Rule 1.5 (Fees), particularly in the context of charging clients for the use of AI-driven services or solutions; and (5) Rule 8.4 (Misconduct/Baias) regarding actions that are prejudicial to the administration of justice and how AI can produce bias results. This seminar will discuss these Rules of Professional Conduct with live demonstrations and examples.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Discussion of Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, and 8.4.
  • Discussion of the proper uses of AI for attorneys in compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct
  • Live demonstrations of ChatGPT and the dangers for attorneys
  • Discussion of other concerns regarding AI regarding client use, evidence manipulation, and cybersecurity

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Courtney Sarnow_Culhane Meadows Haughian & Walsh PLLC._myLawCLECourtney Sarnow, Partner | Culhane Meadows

Courtney Sarnow is a partner in the Atlanta office of Culhane Meadows with over twenty five years of experience in a broad-based transactional practice with a specific focus on intellectual property and technology. She has developed a distinctly creative and problem solving approach to address client plans and issues. As a young attorney, Ms. Sarnow learned that focusing on what a client can’t do and shouldn’t do is unnecessarily limiting and seldom helps the client maximize corporate opportunities. Her approach of looking for ways to accomplish corporate goals within an informed legal framework is more valuable for growth focused, technology forward companies than a stereotypical corporate counsel who instinctively thwarts innovation.

Early in her career with Dow, Lohnes & Albertson in Atlanta, she worked in the Mergers & Acquisitions Group and in IP Licensing with traditional clients, as well as some unusual NASCAR and Professional Bull Rider representation thrown in from time to time. This gave her an appreciation for creative clients. After a sojourn in Philadelphia at Temple University as a Teaching Fellow earning an LLM in Law Teaching and studying developing issues in computer law and software licensing, she returned to Atlanta to teach as an Adjunct at Emory Law and develop a practice focused on intellectual property protection and general corporate strategies for artists, inventers and innovative entrepreneurial ventures.

 

Dhara Shah_myLawCLEDhara Shah, Counsel | InfoLawGroup LLP

Dhara focuses her practice on data privacy and technology law. Dhara’s technical background and proficiency with a wide range of programming languages allows her to engage with clients’ in-house legal and operational teams to identify and handle the legal aspects of highly technical issues – while simultaneously meeting business objectives and protecting consumer privacy interests. Dhara serves as the lead of the IAPP’s AI Governance Group and is on the board of the Arizona State Bar’s Technology Advisory Group.

 

Cari Sheehan_myLawCLECari L. Sheehan, JD | Indiana University Kelley School of Business

Cari Sheehan is an Assistant Clinical Professor of Business Law & Ethics at the IU Kelley School of Business – Indianapolis where she currently teaches Commercial Law and Business Ethics. Additionally, Ms. Sheehan is an Adjunct Professor at the Robert H. McKinney School of Law where she has taught courses in Appellate Practice and Procedure, Torts, and Professional Responsibility. In practice, Ms. Sheehan is a conflict ethics attorney at Scopelitis Garvin Light Hanson & Feary advising on ethical issues. Ms. Sheehan is a well-respected seminar and continuing legal education speaker covering a range of ethical issues across various platforms both locally and on a national level. Similarly, Ms. Sheehan authors a business ethics column in conjunction with the Hamilton County Business Journal about the benefits and pitfalls of business ethics.

Contact Info:
Email: clsheeha@iu.edu; or csheehan@scopelitis.com
Tel: (812) 239-4187
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cari-sheehan-esq-7583ba3b

Agenda

Session I – AI and Copyright – Analyzing The Legal Impact of Generative AI Under the Copyright Act | 11:40am – 1:50pm

  • Copyright Basics. What does copyright law protect? What are the limitations on that protection?
  • Generative AI basics. (non-technical) What it is, what it isn’t and where it is heading

Break | 12:40pm – 12:50pm

  • The Intersection of Copyright Law and Generative AI
    • AI training and scraping as Infringement or Fair Use
    • AI generated works as Infringement or Fair Use
    • The problem of AI “authorship” of creative works under the Copyright Act
  • Gaps in the Current Law
    • Protection of Style
    • Name Image and Likeness
  • Best Practices. How to Survive in a Legal Environment that Changes on a Daily Basis

Break | 1:50pm – 2:00pm

Session II – The AI Policy Act – What This Means for Businesses and the Future of AI Regulation in the US | 2:00pm – 3:00pm

  • Generative AI
  • Breakdown of Utah’s AI Policy Act
  • Key Considerations for Businesses Using AI
  • Future of AI Legislation in the US

Break | 3:00pm – 3:10pm

Session III – Ethical AI in Law: Navigating the Rules of Professional Conduct | 3:10pm – 4:10pm

  • Discussion of Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, and 8.4.
  • Discussion of the proper uses of AI for attorneys in compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct
  • Live demonstrations of ChatGPT and the dangers for attorneys
  • Discussion of other concerns regarding AI regarding client use, evidence manipulation, and cybersecurity

Credits

Alaska

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Arkansas's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General, 1 Ethics

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
3 General, 1 Ethics Hours

Delaware

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Florida

Reciprocity
3.5 General, 1 Ethics

Attorneys receive CLE credit in FL via reciprocity.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
3 General, 1 Ethics Hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
3 General, 1 Ethics Hours

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Ethics credits can ONLY be earned through Live-Webcast programs, the Maine Board of Bar Examiners does not approve Ethics through On-Demand sessions.
Michigan

No MCLE Required
3 General, 1 Ethics Hours

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3.6 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General, 1.2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Nevada

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
3.6 General, 1.2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “A”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
3.5 General, 1 Ethics

Oregon

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
3.5 General, 1 Ethics

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
3 General, 1 Ethics Hours

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Virginia

Not Eligible
3 General Hours, 1 Ethics Hours Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
3 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
3 Law and Legal, 1 Ethics

Eligible for CLE credit. Attorneys must self-apply to the Washington Bar for CLE course attendance credit. myLawCLE will proactively supply Washington attorneys with the self-application package.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
4.5 General,

Ethics credits can ONLY be earned through Live-Webcast programs, the Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners does not approve Ethics through On-Demand sessions.
West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
3 General, 1 Ethics

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Register Now

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate
Drafting for Legal Professionals in Real Estate Wed, April 2, 2025
Live Webcast
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition)
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition) Thu, April 3, 2025
Live Webcast
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition)
Annual Mini-Medical School (2025 Edition) Thu, April 10, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific)
Commercial Evictions in Florida (Florida Specific) Fri, April 11, 2025
Live Webcast
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win
Motions That Persuade: Crafting Arguments That Win Wed, April 16, 2025
Live Webcast
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives
Nonbankruptcy Restructuring Alternatives Fri, April 18, 2025
Live Webcast
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition)
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
Live Webcast