Key Issues in Electronic Discovery: AI Tools, Cloud Data, Personal Devices

Brian R. Iverson
Alex Jacobs
Matthew J. Sharbaugh
Brian R. Iverson | Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
Alex Jacobs | Berkeley Research Group LLC
Matthew J. Sharbaugh | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Live Video-Broadcast: May 29, 2025

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Acces Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

In 2003, U.S. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin issued the seminal decisions on electronic discovery and data preservation in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg. A few years later, in 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to reference “electronically stored information” or ESI. Since then, technology and data storage have continued to evolve. Businesses can now store exponentially more data at a small fraction of the cost, and many companies allow employees to use personal devices for business purposes. The rules and case law likewise continue to evolve alongside the technological advances, and this webinar explores three key issues in electronic discovery in 2025.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Leveraging artificial intelligence and Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) in litigation
  • Cloud storage and e-discovery: Legal and practical considerations
  • Discovery challenges in the era of personal devices and BYOD policies

Date / Time: May 29, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Brian R. Iverson_myLawCLEBrian R. Iverson | Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Brian R. Iverson counsels clients on high-stakes litigation in federal and state courts across the nation. His practice primarily focuses on complex business disputes, including government contract, healthcare, intellectual property, and financial services litigation. Brian also represents clients in administrative and ADR proceedings, and he serves as a mediator for the D.C. Superior Court Multi- Door Dispute Resolution Division. His recent reported decisions include Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc. v. C&O Developers, LLC, 199 N.E.3d 1 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022) and Safeguard Base Ops., LLC v. United States, 989 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2021).

Brian frequently speaks and writes on various legal topics, and his articles have appeared in The ACC Docket, The New York Law Journal, Today’s General Counsel, Adweek, Chief Executive and others. He recently addressed emerging issues in remote depositions in the article Give Me A Break: Regulating Communications Between Attorneys and Their Witness Clients During Deposition Recesses, 36 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 497 (2023).

Brian earned a Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from Pepperdine University School of Law, and he earned a Bachelor of Business Administration, cum laude, from Belmont University.

 

Alex Jacobs | Berkeley Research Group LLC

Alex Jacobs has more than twenty-five years of experience answering discovery requests and assisting clients with internal investigations, civil litigation, and in response to a criminal, governmental, or regulatory subpoena. Mr. Jacobs has employed the use of TAR in discovery for over a decade and consults with clients to enact workflows and Generative AI tools to minimize costs associated with voluminous document review and information retrieval.

He has worked within service providers, consulting firms, law firms, and industry startups. Mr. Jacobs works on clients’ most complex matters, using cutting-edge technology to minimize risk and cost. He is experienced and certified in multiple technology platforms and regularly creates new workflow tools as bespoke deliverables for client engagements.

Mr. Jacobs has worked on high-profile matters in most major industry verticals, including aerospace, oil and gas, financial services and banking, insurance, real estate, and transportation. He is well versed in all phases of the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) and Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM), identifying cost-reduction strategies that exist upstream from the eDiscovery process. He regularly consults with clients on best practices and protocols for data governance and information management, including deploying culture and education campaigns to increase employee retention of legal department policies and procedures.

Mr. Jacobs is the immediate past president and a founding member of the Dallas chapter of the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS). He is active in the community as a thought leader and panelist at conferences and continuing legal education events. Mr. Jacobs studied economics at the University of Texas at Austin.

 

Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Sharbaugh | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Matthew J. Sharbaugh was appointed as a United States Magistrate Judge in October 2024. Judge Sharbaugh was born and raised in Wilmington, Delaware. He earned a Bachelor of Music, summa cum laude, from Berklee College of Music, and he earned a J.D., summa cum laude, from Pepperdine University School of Law, where he served as the Managing Editor of the Pepperdine Law Review.

Judge Sharbaugh was previously a partner with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP in Washington, DC, with a practice focused on employment litigation and appeals, as well as other complex civil litigation and a variety of pro bono matters. Earlier in his career, Judge Sharbaugh spent several years with the law firm Littler Mendelson, P.C. in Los Angeles, California. From there, Judge Sharbaugh served twice as a law clerk to Judge Robert L. Wilkins, first on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and then on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Judge Sharbaugh also spent several years following his clerkships teaching legal research and writing as an adjunct professor at The George Washington University Law School.

Agenda

I. Leveraging artificial intelligence and Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) in litigation | 1:00pm – 1:40pm

  • Growth of data volumes and the need for efficient review methods
  • Role of AI and TAR in reducing costs and identifying key evidence
  • Ethical duties of litigators to understand and assess AI tools
  • Assessment of available software solutions for document review
  • Best practices and limitations of using AI and TAR
  • Analysis of court rulings and ethical opinions on technology use in document collection and review

II. Cloud storage and e-discovery: Legal and practical considerations | 1:40pm – 2:30pm

  • The shift from on-premise storage to cloud-based solutions
  • Cost savings and risk reduction associated with cloud storage
  • Challenges of managing large volumes of data in the cloud

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

  • Legal standards impacting discovery of cloud-stored data
    • Proportionality under discovery rules
    • Possession, custody, and control analysis
  • Case law trends and rules governing preservation, collection, and production of cloud- based data

III. Discovery challenges in the era of personal devices and BYOD policies | 2:30pm – 3:10pm

  • Prevalence of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies in the workplace
  • Increasing access to business data on personal smartphones and devices
  • Expanding scope of discovery to include texts and documents from personal devices
  • Employer’s ability and obligation to obtain data from employee devices
  • Case law developments addressing personal device discovery and privacy concerns

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Indiana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washignton via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Register Now

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition)
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition) Wed, May 7, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition)
IRS Enforcement: Tax Liens & Tax Levies (2025 Edition) Thu, May 8, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Ethics for Plaintiff Firms at Settlement
Ethics for Plaintiff Firms at Settlement Fri, May 9, 2025
Live Webcast
Alcohol Industry Legal Risks & Rules
Alcohol Industry Legal Risks & Rules Tue, May 13, 2025
Live Webcast
Microsoft Copilot 365 AI tool for Lawyers (Part 1)
Microsoft Copilot 365 AI tool for Lawyers (Part 1) Tue, May 13, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2024 Edition) Fri, May 16, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition)
Adobe Acrobat Pro for Lawyers (2025 Edition) Tue, May 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Real Estate LLC Disputes
Real Estate LLC Disputes Tue, May 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay